SOLOIST-WHF: Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure

Bhatt DL, et al. Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure. NEJM 2020

Bottom line:

  • Among patients with type 2 diabetes who were within 3 days of discharge from an acute HF admission (any ejection fraction), sotagliflozin (combined SGLT1+SLGTI2 inhibitor) reduced the risk of a composite of CV death, HF hospitalization or urgent visit for HF requiring IV diuretics vs placebo (NNT 7) at 9 months.

  • These results are consistent with & extend those of the DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials in patients with HFrEF +/- diabetes, as well as CANVAS, DECLARE and EMPA-REG in patients with type 2 diabetes +/- HF.

  • Sotagliflozin increased the risk of diarrhea (by 3%) and severe hypoglycemia (by 1%), which may be unique to this agent due to its effect on SGLT1.

Patients (n=1222)

  • From June 2019-March 2020, 1549 screened -> 1222 randomized

  • Included

    • Acute HF (before discharge or within 3 after discharge)

      • Hospitalization or urgent visit to emergency department, HF unit, or infusion center for worsening HF

      • Treated with IV loop diuretics during hospitalization/urgent visit

      • BNP 150+ pg/mL (450+ if AF) or NT-proBNP 600+ (1800+ if AF)

      • HF diagnosis for 3+ months

      • Prior chronic treatment with loop diuretic 30+ days

    • Clinically stable (no need for supplemental O2, SBP 100+ mm Hg, no IV inotropes/vasodilators, transitioned from IV to PO diuretics)

    • Type 2 diabetes (existing diagnosis prior to HF admission or lab diagnosis during admission)

    • No ejection fraction restriction

  • Key exclusion criteria:

    • Age <18 or >85

    • Acute HF triggered by PE, CVA or MI, or not caused primarily by volume overload (e.g. infection, arrhythmia, severe anemia)

    • Specific HF etiologies (HOCM, peripartium cardiomyopathy, uncorrected primary valvular disease, uncorrected thyroid disorder)

    • eGFR <30

  • Baseline (average/proportions)

    • 70 y/o, female 34%

    • White 93%, Black 4%, Asian 1%

    • North America ~7%

    • HF characteristics

      • Median KCCQ-12 35/100

      • Median LVEF 35% (LVEF<50% in 79%)

      • Median NT-proBNP ~1800

    • Clinical variables: SBP 122, eGFR 50, HbA1c 7.1%

    • Therapies

      • ACEI 42%, ARB 40%, ARNI 15%

      • Beta-blocker 92%

      • MRA ~65%

      • Antihyperglycemics: Metformin 53%, sulfonylurea (19%,, DPP4i 16%, GLP1RA 3%, insulin 36%

Intervention & Control

  • Intervention: Sotagliflozin

    • Starting dose: 200 mg once daily (median time from discharge to first dose: 2 days)

    • Uptitrated to 400 mg once daily as tolerated after 2 weeks

  • Control: Matching placebo

Outcomes

CV outcomes @ median 9 months

  • Death from any cause: Sotagliflozin 13.5% vs placebo 16.3% (HR 0.82, 0.59-1.14)

  • Composite of time to first CV death or HF hospitalization:

    • Sotagliflozin 33% vs placebo 48% (15% absolute reduction, number needed to treat [NNT]=7

    • Hazard ratio (HR) 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.89)

  • Primary outcome (total number of CV death, HF hospitalization, or urgent visit for HF resulting in IV therapy): 51.0 vs 76.3 /100 patient-years (difference 25.3 events/100 patient-years)

    • Consistent across subgroups, including by LVEF (LVEF <50%: HR 0.72 [95% CI 0.56-0.94] & LVEF >=50%: HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.27-0.86]

Quality of life (QoL) @ month 4

  • Measured using short-form Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ-12], range from 0 [worst] to 100 [best], Minimal clinically-important difference is a 5-point improvement/worsening)

  • Mean difference between groups: +4.1 points (/100) in favor of sotagliflozin

Safety @ median 18 months (none statistically significant vs placebo)

  • Significant increases in:

    • Diarrhea: 6.1% vs 3.4%

    • Severe hypoglycemia: 1.5% vs 0.3%

  • No significant differences in:

    • Serious adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation: 3.0% vs 2.8%

    • Discontinuation study drug: 13.0% vs 15.3%

    • Hypotension: 6.0% vs 4.6%

    • Acute kidney injury: 4.1% vs 4.4%

    • UTI: 4.8% vs 5.1%

    • Hyperkalemia: 4.3% vs 5.1%

    • Diabetic ketoacidosis: 0.3% vs 0.7%

Internal validity: Low risk of allocation, performance, detection & attrition bias

  • Computer-generated randomization, stratified by LVEF (<50% or >=50%)

  • Allocation concealed by interactive voice/web-response system

  • Participants, clinicians unaware of treatment assignment (blinded)

  • Loss-to-follow-up 3.5% (similar between groups)

  • Analysis of the intention-to-treat (ITT) population