SOLOIST-WHF: Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure
Bottom line:
Among patients with type 2 diabetes who were within 3 days of discharge from an acute HF admission (any ejection fraction), sotagliflozin (combined SGLT1+SLGTI2 inhibitor) reduced the risk of a composite of CV death, HF hospitalization or urgent visit for HF requiring IV diuretics vs placebo (NNT 7) at 9 months.
These results are consistent with & extend those of the DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials in patients with HFrEF +/- diabetes, as well as CANVAS, DECLARE and EMPA-REG in patients with type 2 diabetes +/- HF.
Sotagliflozin increased the risk of diarrhea (by 3%) and severe hypoglycemia (by 1%), which may be unique to this agent due to its effect on SGLT1.
Patients (n=1222)
From June 2019-March 2020, 1549 screened -> 1222 randomized
Included
Acute HF (before discharge or within 3 after discharge)
Hospitalization or urgent visit to emergency department, HF unit, or infusion center for worsening HF
Treated with IV loop diuretics during hospitalization/urgent visit
BNP 150+ pg/mL (450+ if AF) or NT-proBNP 600+ (1800+ if AF)
HF diagnosis for 3+ months
Prior chronic treatment with loop diuretic 30+ days
Clinically stable (no need for supplemental O2, SBP 100+ mm Hg, no IV inotropes/vasodilators, transitioned from IV to PO diuretics)
Type 2 diabetes (existing diagnosis prior to HF admission or lab diagnosis during admission)
No ejection fraction restriction
Key exclusion criteria:
Age <18 or >85
Acute HF triggered by PE, CVA or MI, or not caused primarily by volume overload (e.g. infection, arrhythmia, severe anemia)
Specific HF etiologies (HOCM, peripartium cardiomyopathy, uncorrected primary valvular disease, uncorrected thyroid disorder)
eGFR <30
Baseline (average/proportions)
70 y/o, female 34%
White 93%, Black 4%, Asian 1%
North America ~7%
HF characteristics
Median KCCQ-12 35/100
Median LVEF 35% (LVEF<50% in 79%)
Median NT-proBNP ~1800
Clinical variables: SBP 122, eGFR 50, HbA1c 7.1%
Therapies
ACEI 42%, ARB 40%, ARNI 15%
Beta-blocker 92%
MRA ~65%
Antihyperglycemics: Metformin 53%, sulfonylurea (19%,, DPP4i 16%, GLP1RA 3%, insulin 36%
Intervention & Control
Intervention: Sotagliflozin
Starting dose: 200 mg once daily (median time from discharge to first dose: 2 days)
Uptitrated to 400 mg once daily as tolerated after 2 weeks
Control: Matching placebo
Outcomes
CV outcomes @ median 9 months
Death from any cause: Sotagliflozin 13.5% vs placebo 16.3% (HR 0.82, 0.59-1.14)
Composite of time to first CV death or HF hospitalization:
Sotagliflozin 33% vs placebo 48% (15% absolute reduction, number needed to treat [NNT]=7
Hazard ratio (HR) 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.89)
Primary outcome (total number of CV death, HF hospitalization, or urgent visit for HF resulting in IV therapy): 51.0 vs 76.3 /100 patient-years (difference 25.3 events/100 patient-years)
Consistent across subgroups, including by LVEF (LVEF <50%: HR 0.72 [95% CI 0.56-0.94] & LVEF >=50%: HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.27-0.86]
Quality of life (QoL) @ month 4
Measured using short-form Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ-12], range from 0 [worst] to 100 [best], Minimal clinically-important difference is a 5-point improvement/worsening)
Mean difference between groups: +4.1 points (/100) in favor of sotagliflozin
Safety @ median 18 months (none statistically significant vs placebo)
Significant increases in:
Diarrhea: 6.1% vs 3.4%
Severe hypoglycemia: 1.5% vs 0.3%
No significant differences in:
Serious adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation: 3.0% vs 2.8%
Discontinuation study drug: 13.0% vs 15.3%
Hypotension: 6.0% vs 4.6%
Acute kidney injury: 4.1% vs 4.4%
UTI: 4.8% vs 5.1%
Hyperkalemia: 4.3% vs 5.1%
Diabetic ketoacidosis: 0.3% vs 0.7%
Internal validity: Low risk of allocation, performance, detection & attrition bias
Computer-generated randomization, stratified by LVEF (<50% or >=50%)
Allocation concealed by interactive voice/web-response system
Participants, clinicians unaware of treatment assignment (blinded)
Loss-to-follow-up 3.5% (similar between groups)
Analysis of the intention-to-treat (ITT) population