CONSENSUS - Enalapril in severe HF
Bottom line: In patients with NYHA class IV HF (presumably with reduced EF), enalapril reduced the risk of death (NNT 6-7) & reduced symptom burden at 6 & 12 months.
Patients (n=253)
- Inclusion
- Clinical diagosis of HF
- Hx of heart disease
- Symptoms of dyspnea and/or fatigue
- Signs of fluid retention
- Symptomatic at rest (NYHA functional class IV)
- Cardiomegaly on CXR, defined as heart size
- Men: >600 mL/m^2
- Women: >550 mL/m^2
- No assessment of myocaridal function performed (? LVEF)
- Clinical diagosis of HF
- Exclusion
- NYHA <IV after optimization with diuretics & digoxin
- Hemodynamically important aortic/mitral stenosis
- MI <2 months
- Unstable angina
- Planned cardiac surgery
- 1o pulmonary disease or right HF due to pulmonary disease
- SCr >300 umol/L
- "Average" patient
- Age 70
- Female 30%
- HF duration: <18 months (25%), 18 months to 4 y (~25%), >4 y (50%)
- PMHx
- CAD 73%, previous MI 48%
- Cardiomyopathy 15%
- Valvular heart disease ~20%
- AF ~50%
- BP 120/75 mm Hg
- SCr 130 umol/L
- K 4.0 mmol/L
- Meds
- Furosemide 90% (mean dose 200 mg)
- Spironolactone 55% (mean dose 80 mg)
- Digoxin 93%
- Nitrate 45%, hydralazine 2%
- Anticoagulant 33%
Interventions & co-interventions
- I: Enalapril
- Initial dose 5 mg PO BID (started in hospital)
- Then increased to 10 mg PO BID after 1 week
- Then the dose could be increased up to 20 mg PO BID
- Mean dose @ end of study: 18.4 mg/day (~10 mg PO BID)
- C: Matching placebo
- Co-interventions
- Optimized on diuretics +/- digoxin at start of trial
- Other non-ACEI vasodilators permitted, including nitrates, alpha-1 blockers, hydralazine
Results @ 6 months
- Death, statistically significant reduction
- @ 6 months (primary outcome): 26% vs 44% (NNT 6 - relative risk reduction (RRR) 40%)
- @ 1 year: 36% vs 52% (NNT 7 - RRR 31%)
- Improvement in NYHA functional class: 42% vs 22% (NNT 5)
- Study drug discontinuation: 17% vs 14% (NSS)
Issues with internal validity?
- Possible exaggeration of benefit due to early termination for mortality in enalapril group in unplanned interim analysis
- Otherwise well-designed: Randomized, allocation-concealed, blinded trial with low loss-to-follow-up analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle