RE-DUAL PCI - Dabigatran-based dual antithrombotic regimen in patients with AF after PCI
Bottom line:
RE-DUAL PCI provides further evidence supporting dual therapy with an oral anticoagulant + P2Y12 inhibitor in patients with AF post-PCI instead of triple therapy.
Dual therapy with dabigatran 150 mg BID reduced clinically relevant bleeds (NNT 19) as well as major bleeds (NNT 36-56 depending on definition), & was non-inferior in terms of thromboembolic events over approximately 1 year.
Dual therapy with dabigatran 110 mg BID showed a possible increase in death, MI & definite stent thrombosis, & was potentially inferior for the composite efficacy outcome. Despite reducing major & clinically-relevant bleeds, this regimen can't be recommended due to inadequate evidence of efficacy in this setting.
Notably, the PIONEER trial did not assess for non-inferiority of rivaroxaban-based dual therapy regimens to triple therapy, but if it had, it would not have met the non-inferiority criteria from RE-DUAL PCI. However, the PIONEER results did not show the concerning numerical trends seen here with dabigatran 110 mg BID.
Patients (n=2725)
Included
Non-valvular AFib (paroxysmal, persistent or permanent)
PCI (bare-metal or drug-eluting stent) within 120h for stable CAD or ACS
Exclusion
Bioprosthetic or mechanical heart valve
CrCl <30 mL/min
"Other major coexisting conditions"
Baseline characteristics
~72 y
Female ~24%
AF characteristics
Paroxysmal (~50%), persistent (~17%), permanent (33%)
CHA2DS2-VASc score ~4, HAS-BLED score ~3
Previous stroke 10%
PCI characteristics
Previous: MI ~25%, PCI ~33%, CABG ~10%
Indication for PCI: ACS (~50%), stable angina/+ stress test (44%), other (~6%)
Drug eluting stent 85%
Interventions
Intervention1: Dabigatran 150 mg BID + clopidogrel/ticagrelor
Note: Elderly outside the US not eligible for this group due to dabigatran labeling
Intervention2: Dabigatran 110 mg BID + clopidogrel/ticagrelor
Control ("triple therapy"): Warfarin (INR 2-3) + clopidogrel/ticagrelor + low-dose ASA
ASA D/Ced after 1 month with bare-metal stent or 3 months with drug-eluting stent
Time in therapeutic INR: 64%
In all groups
P2Y12 inhibitor was continued for at least 12 months
P2Y12 inhibitor chosen: Clopidogrel 88%, ticagrelor 12%
Mean duration of trial anticoagulant: 12.3 months
Results @ mean 14 months
Dabigatran 150 mg BID vs triple therapy (control group excludes elderly outside US not eligible for higher dabigatran dose)
Primary outcome (major or clinically relevant non-major bleed, ISTH definition):
Dabi150 20.2%, control 25.7%, NNT 19
HR 0.72 (0.58-0.88), p<0.001 for non-inferiority
Major bleed:
ISTH definition: Dabi150 5.6%, control 8.4%, HR 0.64 (0.43-0.94), NNT 36
TIMI definition: Dabi150 2.1%, control 3.9%, HR 0.51 (0.28-0.93), NNT 56
Intracranial hemorrhage: Dabi150 0.1%, control 1.0%, p=0.047
Composite efficacy outcome (death, MI, stroke, or systemic embolism, or unplanned PCI/CABG): Dabi150 11.8%, control 12.8%, HR 0.89 (0.67-1.19)
Dabigatran 110 mg BID vs triple therapy
Primary outcome:
Dabi110 15.4%, control 26.9%, NNT 9
HR 0.52 (0.42-0.63), p<0.001 for non-inferiority
Major bleed:
ISTH definition: Dabi110 5.0%, control 9.2%, HR 0.52 (0.37-0.74), NNT 24
TIMI definition: Dabi110 1.4%, control 3.8%, HR 0.37 (0.20-0.68), NNT 42
Intracranial hemorrhage: Dabi110 0.3%, control 1.0%, p=0.06
Composite efficacy outcome: Dabi110 15.2%, control 13.4%, HR 1.13 (0.90-1.43) - did not meet non-inferiority criteria
Thromboembolic events or death: Dabi110 11.0%, control 8.5%, HR 1.30 (0.98-1.73)
Death Dabi110 5.6%, control 4.9%
MI: Dabi110 4.5%, control 3.0%
Definite stent thrombosis: Dabi110 1.5%, control 0.8%
Considerations
Low to unclear risk of bias
Unclear randomization & allocation concealment (not adequately reported)
Open-label design - low risk of performance bias, but high risk of detection bias for softer outcomes (ie clinically significant non-major bleeds)
Low risk of attrition bias (ITT analysis that included all randomized patients regardless of receipt of study intervention; 0.2% lost to follow-up, <4% withdrew consent with no vital status available at end of study)
Non-inferiority trial
Non-inferiority margin 1.38 for HR upper end of 95% confidence interval for both efficacy & safety outcomes
Primary analysis using ITT population with sensitivity on-treatment analysis
Dual therapy with dabi150 met non-inferiority for both bleeding & thromboembolic outcomes, but dabi110 only met non-inferiority criteria for bleeding
Excellent generalizability due to broad eligibility criteria & enrolment of a representative, relatively elderly population
Unadjusted bleed rates from a subgroup analysis by choice of P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel vs ticagrelor) suggest that risk of bleeding increases gradually with number of antithrombotic agents as well as potency of the inhibitor, e.g. ISTH major bleed over mean 14 months from Figure 2:
Clopidogrel + dabigatran: ~5%
Clopidogrel + ASA + warfarin OR ticagrelor + dabigatran: ~8%
Ticagrelor + ASA + warfarin: ~16.5%